On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 17:12 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:57:12PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > > Christoph, we're glad to report that this patch does fix the problem. > > Wonder if Al or someone can pick it up. It is a large regression > > that should not be left unfixed for 3.16. > > Al has been away for a bit, and I prepared the last VFS pull. I'll pick > it up for now and either Al or I will send it on before next weekend. > > Can I get a tested-by tag from you for the patch? Can anyone else > please cross check it? The new total value might be different from > the old size value when we do a short write, but I can't see how > an async write would be a good thing if we had to finish the remainder > using buffered I/O if the old code really allowed that. > Yes, please put in Tested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Suruchi Kadu <suruchi.a.kadu@xxxxxxxxx> Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
