On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:45:40PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:47:53PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > vm_insert_mixed() will fail if there is already a valid PTE at that > > location. The DAX code would rather replace the previous value with > > the new PTE. > > @@ -1492,8 +1492,12 @@ static int insert_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > > if (!pte) > > goto out; > > retval = -EBUSY; > > - if (!pte_none(*pte)) > > - goto out_unlock; > > + if (!pte_none(*pte)) { > > + if (!replace) > > + goto out_unlock; > > + VM_BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&vma->vm_file->f_mapping->i_mmap_mutex)); > > + zap_page_range_single(vma, addr, PAGE_SIZE, NULL); > > zap_page_range_single() takes ptl by itself in zap_pte_range(). It's not > going to work. I have a test program that exercises this path ... it seems to work! Following the code, I don't understand why it does. Maybe it's not exercising this path after all? I've attached the program (so that I have an "oh, duh" moment about 5 seconds after sending the email). > And zap_page_range*() is pretty heavy weapon to shoot down one pte, which > we already have pointer to. Why? I'd love to use a lighter-weight weapon! What would you recommend using, zap_pte_range()?
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <errno.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int fd; void *addr; char buf[4096]; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s filename\n", argv[0]); exit(1); } if ((fd = open(argv[1], O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0666)) < 0) { perror(argv[1]); exit(1); } if (ftruncate(fd, 4096) < 0) { perror("ftruncate"); exit(1); } if ((addr = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0)) == MAP_FAILED) { perror("mmap"); exit(1); } close(fd); /* first read */ memcpy(buf, addr, 4096); /* now write a bit */ memcpy(addr, buf, 8); printf("%s: test passed.\n", argv[0]); exit(0); }