Re: VFS tree for 3.17?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:41:36AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> Do you plan to put a VFS tree together for 3.17?  To me the various
> renameat2 bits from Miklos are something I'd really prefer to not miss,
> but there might be other bits waiting for attention as well.

Another weeks has passed and I'd really like to make sure we don't
let the VFS leap.

I'll try to put together a tree over the next days so we can at least
get a minium amount of linux-next exposure.  Candidates are:

 - the direct-io.c warning fix from Boaz (really should 3.16 actually)
 - the unmount on symlink reference count fix
 - the rename/rename2 patches from Mikilos.  These are a bit older
   and could use a respin.

Anything else I've missed?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux