On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Heiko Carstens wrote: > Yes, that doesn't make any sense. I wrote the patch together in a hurry and > didn't think much about it. > So below is the what I think most simple conversion to a vmalloc fallback > approach for seq files. However the question remains if this seems to be an > acceptable approach at all... > I think the approach is fine. We do now have a generic kvfree() function defined in mm.h that will handle the freeing, though, determined by is_vmalloc_addr() so seq_free() is no longer necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
