Re: Unionmount and overlayfs testsuite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> [ NOTE-2: The call-trace I have seen once (TERMSLASH=0). ]
>>>
>>> Do you know for which operation?

This still looks like the same annotation problem in
generic_file_splice_write() I already sent a patch for.

Fix now pushed to overlayfs.v22/overlayfs.current.

Also added ops to shmem to support the cases where RENAME_EXCHANGE and
RENAME_WHITEOUT are needed.  Not sure if the testsuite goes into these
at all, but anyway.

If I remove the assert_early_copy_up calls from impermissible.test
(which seem to be bogus), then the suite passes for overlayfs without
lockdep problems for me.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux