Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 06:46:09 +0200
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, logfs@xxxxxxxxx, linux-afs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, codalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, coda@xxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fuse-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ntfs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lftan@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <57071155-5a08-4579-9189-92d442cd65e7@email.android.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:34:12PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Typically they are using 64-bit signed seconds.

Okay, that is what I wanted to know.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
  - From: Richard Cochran
- Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
  - From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
  - From: Richard Cochran
- Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
  - From: H. Peter Anvin

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
Next by Date: [PATCHv7 4/6] file: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 00/32] making inode time stamps y2038 ready
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]