Re: Unionmount and overlayfs testsuite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:41 PM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> >> /mnt/a/foo101: Test file not on upper filesystem  (line 30)
>> >
>> > Now check dmesg.
>> >
>>
>> [ 1384.995334] tmpfs: No value for mount option 'union'
>
> That's going down the unionmount testing route, it would appear.  You're
> definitely doing:
>
>         TEST_OVERLAYFS=1 ./run.sh
>
> right?
>

Yes (with my mount-patch applied).

( ...and... # umount /lower /upper /mnt )

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux