On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:04:58AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This patch fixes two bugs: > > Mind if I change it to avoid the "goto"? I don't think goto is evil, > but in this case it doesn't seem to buy anything, except to perhaps > make the patch a bit smaller at the expense of making the result a bit > harder to read. > > Replacing the > > if (ret <= 0) > goto out; > > with > > if (ret > 0) { > ... > } > > also allows moving the various variable declarations closer to their use. > > So something like the attached.. I'm not sure it's better; I've a pending patch that does combination of rw_copy_check_uvector() with iov_iter_init(), which means that iov array will be going to the outer scope anyway... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html