On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:04:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > Looks your approach is simpler. > > But looks there is one problem if I understand correctly: > __blk_recalc_rq_segments() may not cover the last vector > because bio->bi_iter.bi_size isn't updated until the end of > __bio_add_page(). > > But it shouldn't have been related with current virtio-blk problem. > This is a valid point, bi_iter.bi_size influences the behaviour of blk_recount_segments(). Maybe Jens can confirm your observation. Anyway it doesn't explain the reason behind the regression introduced by commit 3979ef4dcf Maurizio Lombardi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
