On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:12:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Yes, that's why I wrote that if we find that uniqueness of inode numbers > in tmpfs is needed, then we should probably just make tmpfs add inodes to > hash list and use iunique(). That would seem like a better solution to me. Any reason not to just use the ida allocator for inode numbers in tmpfs? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
