On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:54:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > > This helps hang troubleshooting efforts when only dmesg is available. > > I really don't think that spamming dmesg every time a filesystem is > frozen or thawed is a good idea. This happens a *lot* when systems > are using snapshots, and for the most part nobody cares about > freeze/thaw cycles because they almost always work just fine. The problems people are worried about are when there is freezing and unfreezing taking place in combination with a machine-level suspend/resume cycle, no? What if we only spammed dmesg when doing a suspend/resume? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
