Re: dcache shrink list corruption?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>       Help with profiling is needed; the loads to watch are
> the ones where dentry_kill() + dentry_free() are sufficiently high in profiles
> for the differences to matter.  Any takers?

I really hope there are no such loads, my "lock/unlock pairing"
suggestion was mostly so that the pairing is clearer, not necessarily
for performance.

That said, I'd assume that it migth be worth testing at least the
"lots of concurrent lookups of 'simple_dentry_operations' dentries".
So most of /proc, most uses of simple_lookup(). That at least triggers
the dentry_kill() path in dput(), so it should be fairly easy to get
profiles.

But real loads with real filesystems? That sounds harder.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux