Re: [PATCH -V1 19/22] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:52:04AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
> > @@ -240,10 +246,19 @@ void __destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> > -	if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> > -		posix_acl_release(inode->i_acl);
> > -	if (inode->i_default_acl && inode->i_default_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> > -		posix_acl_release(inode->i_default_acl);
> > +	if (IS_POSIXACL(inode)) {
> > +		if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> > +			posix_acl_release(inode->i_acl);
> > +		if (inode->i_default_acl &&
> > +		    inode->i_default_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> > +			posix_acl_release(inode->i_default_acl);
> > +	}
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_RICHACL
> > +	if (IS_RICHACL(inode)) {
> > +		if (inode->i_richacl && inode->i_richacl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> > +			richacl_put(inode->i_richacl);
> > +	}
> >  #endif
> 
> 	if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> 		acl_release(inode->i_acl);
> 
> And all the mess of working out what acl needs releasing get taken
> out of of this code.

Let's go further and have the API simply:

	inode_acl_release(inode);

with inode_acl_release looking something like:

	if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
		acl_release(inode->i_acl);
	if (inode->i_default_acl && inode->i_default_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
		acl_release(inode->i_default_acl);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html