Hi Jeff, Something which came up on the last Ganesha conn call is that we have a pretty strong need for some ability to wait on a set of locks, and perhaps receive events. Frank Filz believed that you had made a proposal which would cover this. Can you elaborate on that? Thanks, Matt ----- "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we really find later that we need to do something like this, I > think > we'd be better off adding a new set of cmd values along with the > "extended" struct, or possibly a new syscall. Some of the samba folks > were interested in an async locking mechanism too, so something like > that could be added in conjunction with such an interface. > -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
