On Sun 23-03-14 15:08:29, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > The 'pfn' returned by axonram was completely bogus, and has been since > 2008. Maybe time to drop the driver instead? When noone noticed for 6 years, it seems pretty much dead... Or is there some possibility the driver can get reused for new HW? Anyway the patch looks correct so feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > index 47b6b9f..830edc8 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ axon_ram_direct_access(struct block_device *device, sector_t sector, > } > > *kaddr = (void *)(bank->ph_addr + offset); > - *pfn = virt_to_phys(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > + *pfn = virt_to_phys(*kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; > > return 0; > } > -- > 1.9.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
