Re: [PATCH v7 10/17] locks: make /proc/locks show IS_FILE_PVT locks with a P suffix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 05:57:11PM -0700, Jeffrey Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:20:47 -0400
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:45:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > In a later patch, we'll be adding a new type of lock that's owned by
> > > the struct file instead of the files_struct. Those sorts of locks
> > > will be flagged with a new IS_FILE_PVT flag.
> > > 
> > > Add a "P" suffix to the POSIX lock output in /proc/locks for locks
> > > that have FL_FILE_PVT set to distinguish them from "classic" POSIX
> > > locks.
> > 
> > ACK, though I'm curious:
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/locks.c         | 9 +++++++--
> > >  include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> > > index 4d4e790150e0..f1b9b149dd39 100644
> > > --- a/fs/locks.c
> > > +++ b/fs/locks.c
> > > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@
> > >  #define IS_POSIX(fl)	(fl->fl_flags & FL_POSIX)
> > >  #define IS_FLOCK(fl)	(fl->fl_flags & FL_FLOCK)
> > >  #define IS_LEASE(fl)	(fl->fl_flags & (FL_LEASE|FL_DELEG))
> > > +#define IS_FILE_PVT(fl)	(fl->fl_flags & FL_FILE_PVT)
> > >  
> > >  static bool lease_breaking(struct file_lock *fl)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -2313,8 +2314,12 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file
> > > *f, struct file_lock *fl, 
> > >  	seq_printf(f, "%lld:%s ", id, pfx);
> > >  	if (IS_POSIX(fl)) {
> > > -		seq_printf(f, "%6s %s ",
> > > -			     (fl->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS) ?
> > > "ACCESS" : "POSIX ",
> > > +		if (fl->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS)
> > > +			seq_printf(f, "ACCESS");
> > 
> > Are FL_ACCESS locks ever put on any global list?  Wouldn't it be a bug
> > to run across one here?
> > 
> > --b.
> > 
> 
> Yes, that can happen (and yes, that surprised me too)
> 
> locks_mandatory_area can send down FL_ACCESS|FL_POSIX|FL_SLEEP
> 
> ...which makes sense given the use-case there but I do wonder if there
> might be a better way...

Got it!

Yeah, that's weird, but I guess it's right.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux