[PATCH 0/2] locks: allow mandatory locking to work with file-private locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patchset fixes the problems that Trond pointed out last week,
namely that you can end up deadlocking yourself if you set a
file-private lock on a file and then do some I/O on the same.

With this set, mandatory locking should work more or less as you'd
expect with file-private locks. If you set a lock on an open file
and then do some I/O on it, it won't block. If you try to lock and
do I/O on different open files, then the I/O may end up blocked.

Note that this approach is just as racy as the existing mandatory
lock implementation, but I don't think it makes anything worse there.

Jeff Layton (2):
  locks: fix locks_mandatory_locked to respect file-private locks
  locks: make locks_mandatory_area check for file-private locks

 fs/locks.c         | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 fs/namei.c         |  2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
 mm/mmap.c          |  2 +-
 mm/nommu.c         |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux