Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Most of the cases have it kept separately in registers, actually - there's >> a reason why fdget() and friends are inlined. > Yes. And bit test and set ops on registers are actually cheaper than > playing around with bytes. Ah. I cut & pasted the code into a separate file and compiled it out of line. But I stubbed a lot, so it went to memory. My bad. > Oh, and George, your email setup is broken. Gmail thinks your emails > are spam. I'm not sure why (the usual spf problems do not apply), but > it's possibly because your name and email looks made up. Thanks, but damn, I wish they'd give a little more information. The horizon.com MX record is correct, the mail server's forward and reverse DNS matches, the SMTP server is a little creaky but I think it's completely standards-compliant. I'm using bsd mailx, which is *definitely* creaky (you'll notice a complete lack of MIME or User-Agent headers), but again, it's kind of the baseline standard for RFC(2)822 e-mail. The one infelicity I'm aware of is that I cut & pasted the headers from an on-line mail archive, but mailx doesn't have an easy way to add an In-Reply-To: header. Perhaps a Subject: beginning with "Re:" and no In-Reply-To: looks odd. But damnifino. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
