Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Umm...   I would be very surprised if that worked well.  You have just
> forced fdget() to comply to the ABI.  And unless that has such structs
> returned in register pairs, there's no way for compiler to do about
> that.

Register pairs are very much a common return model.

And we've relied on that before. For example, 64-bit pte's on x86-32
very much does that whole thing with the "pte_t" union.

So you can now commence being surprised.

(Side note: I think sparc or something doesn't support it, and may
return things in memory. I can't really seem to find it in myself to
care)

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux