On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Um... That's odd - we *could* get there with f.need_put and
> file_count(file) equal to 1, but why would we want to take
> f_pos_lock in that case?
Because that means that the file table is shared among threads. So
another thread can access the struct file pointer and do a concurrent
read() or write() on it, and so we need to lock f_pos.
Basically, there are two cases:
- duplicated file pointers due to fork(). That's the "file_count()" test.
Yes, this will trigger even if they didn't fork, just dup'ed the
file descriptor. We have no way of telling the difference, though.
- concurrent access due to duplicated "struct file_table" pointers.
This is the "need_put" test, since __fget_light() will have tested the
proper files->count already.
Both need f_pos_lock.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
