Yes, I am using the iozone -i 0 -i 1. Let me try the most simple test
as you mentioned.
Best wishes,
--
Ning Qu
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:35:16 -0800 Ning Qu <quning@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Sorry about my fault about the experiments, here is the real one.
>>
>> Btw, apparently, there are still some questions about the results and
>> I will sync with Kirill about his test command line.
>>
>> Below is just some simple experiment numbers from this patch, let me know if
>> you would like more:
>>
>> Tested on Xeon machine with 64GiB of RAM, using the current default fault
>> order 4.
>>
>> Sequential access 8GiB file
>> Baseline with-patch
>> 1 thread
>> minor fault 8,389,052 4,456,530
>> time, seconds 9.55 8.31
>
> The numbers still seem wrong. I'd expect to see almost exactly 2M minor
> faults with this test.
>
> Looky:
>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
>
> #define G (1024 * 1024 * 1024)
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> char *p;
> int fd;
> unsigned long idx;
> int sum = 0;
>
> fd = open("foo", O_RDONLY);
> if (fd < 0) {
> perror("open");
> exit(1);
> }
> p = mmap(NULL, 1 * G, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
> if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> perror("mmap");
> exit(1);
> }
>
> for (idx = 0; idx < 1 * G; idx += 4096)
> sum += p[idx];
> printf("%d\n", sum);
> exit(0);
> }
>
> z:/home/akpm> /usr/bin/time ./a.out
> 0
> 0.05user 0.33system 0:00.38elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4195856maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (0major+262264minor)pagefaults 0swaps
>
> z:/home/akpm> dc
> 16o
> 262264 4 * p
> 1001E0
>
> That's close!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
