On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:28:27 +0200 Sougata Santra <sougata@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This > allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and > incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes > this issue. > > ... > > --- a/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h > +++ b/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus_fs.h > @@ -443,8 +443,10 @@ int hfsplus_cat_case_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *, > const hfsplus_btree_key *); > int hfsplus_cat_bin_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *, > const hfsplus_btree_key *); > -void hfsplus_cat_build_key(struct super_block *sb, > +int hfsplus_cat_build_key(struct super_block *sb, > hfsplus_btree_key *, u32, struct qstr *); > +void hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(struct super_block *sb, > + hfsplus_btree_key *, u32); > int hfsplus_find_cat(struct super_block *, u32, struct hfs_find_data *); > int hfsplus_create_cat(u32, struct inode *, struct qstr *, struct inode *); > int hfsplus_delete_cat(u32, struct inode *, struct qstr *); grumble. Omitting the argument names from declarations makes them unreadable and generally useless. I mean, a bare u32? And including the names of some arguments but omitting others is downright bizarre. However this isn't a thing which can or should be addressed within this patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
