Re: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:44:14 -0800
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1392755345-12830-5-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

>  
> -	return d_obtain_alias(inode);
> +	return d_obtain_alias_root(inode);

Can we call this d_obtain_root or similar, please?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED
  - From: J. Bruce Fields

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: unset DCACHE_DISCONNECTED when mounting default subvol
  - From: J. Bruce Fields
- [PATCH 1/9] dcache: move d_splice_alias
  - From: J. Bruce Fields
- [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED
  - From: J. Bruce Fields

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dcache: close d_move race in d_splice_alias
Next by Date: Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/9] dcache: d_obtain_alias callers don't all want DISCONNECTED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]