Re: O_TMPFILE detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've started implementing support for O_TMPFILE in xfs_io in preparation
> for proper testcases and found something rather annoying:
>
> Given that we implicitly pass O_DIRECTORY as part of the full O_TMPFILE
> flag an open using O_TMPFILE will simply succeed on a kernel old enough
> to not have O_TMPFILE support, and give you a file descriptor for the
> directory passed in.  Of course this only works if you open the fd
> read-only which isn't all that useful for real temporary files, but it
> would be the natural choice for a feature test.

But O_TMPFILE without write access fails on modern kernels, so what
you test doesn't make sense.

In fact, that "O_TMPFILE fails with O_RDONLY" was done exactly so that
you could not have a program that works on kernels with O_TMPFILE
support _and_ opens a directory on old kernels without it. Basically
"O_TMPFILE | O_RDONLY" is an insane thing to do, and will never create
a temporary file.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux