Re: [PATCH 0/3] support appending AIO writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:57:28PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:29:01AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > The patches look sane. Does the dio change conflict with the
> > work Al is doing right now of the direct IO path, or will
> > marshalling that part of the change through the XFS tree be fine?
> 
> I've not seen any changes in that area in Al's trees.  That being said
> I don't think this little flag should cause any major problems as we'll
> have to pass the flags argument in some form of direct I/O method for
> all the other quirks we have.

Shouldn't be a problem; there might be textual conflicts, but seeing that
XFS tree is much less likely to be rebased, I can just pull from it once
it gets to those.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux