> Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: >> diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/inode.c b/fs/hfsplus/inode.c >> index fa929f3..7d18221 100644 >> --- a/fs/hfsplus/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/hfsplus/inode.c >> @@ -494,6 +494,7 @@ int hfsplus_cat_read_inode(struct inode *inode, struct hfs_find_data *fd) >> inode->i_ctime = hfsp_mt2ut(folder->attribute_mod_date); >> HFSPLUS_I(inode)->create_date = folder->create_date; >> HFSPLUS_I(inode)->fs_blocks = 0; >> + HFSPLUS_I(inode)->folder_count = be32_to_cpu(folder->folder_count); > > You check HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT flag below in hfsplus_cat_write_inode() > but you don't check here. Are you sure that it is right way? Thanks for review, Vyacheslav. Yes. I omit a check here and in decrement/increment code. The only check which must be done is when the record is written to the disk.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
