Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND] persistent transparent large

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> Then there's the meta problem of is XIP the right approach.  Using
> persistence within the current memory address space as XIP is a natural
> fit for mixed volatile/NV systems, but what happens when they're all NV
> memory?  Should we be discussing some VM based handling mechanisms for
> persistent memory?

Yes (but at present there's nothing on the table: is the cupboard bare?)

Sorry, answer devoid of content, but since it's my thread...

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux