Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] VFS: Introduce new O_DENY* open flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > (and why not just use EPERM, it has the meaning you want already) 
> We need to determine if we have a share reservation error to map it
> accurately in file servers and wine.

Ok

> > Shouldn't this also check for CAP_SYS_DAC or some similar permission so
> > that root can override such a mess (eg to fix full disks in an
> > emergency) ?
> 
> May be it's better to let root an ability to remount the system
> without sharelock mount option and then fix an emergency?

Doesn't that involve breaking the service for all users of the system
relying upon those locks, while root being allowed to ignore the locks
does not ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux