Re: [RFC PATCH] fs null_blk: Null pointer deference problem in alloc_page_buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/17/2014 11:09 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk.c b/drivers/block/null_blk.c
index a2e69d2..6b0e049 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk.c
@@ -535,6 +535,11 @@ static int null_add_dev(void)
  	if (!nullb)
  		return -ENOMEM;

+	if (bs > PAGE_SIZE) {
+		WARN(1, "Invalid block size. Setting it to 4096\n");
+		bs = 4096;
+	}
+

Why are you hard-coding 4k instead of just using PAGE_SIZE?


Thanks Jeff. Yes,that makes sense. will change.
(got same suggestion from reporter here too)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux