Re: [PATCH 1/1] reiserfs:Adding tmpfile support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Fabian Frederick <fabf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch is largely based on reiserfs_create function.
> > -Removing dquot_initialize (cf ext2/tmpfile)
> > -Removing add_entry code.
> > -Adding d_tmpfile generic call.
> >
> > It was not extensively tested; other solutions would
> > be to work with hidden entries or merge
> > creation - tmpfile process.
> 
> Is it worth adding new features to a legacy file system like reiserfs?

Having user API parity is always a good thing, especially if it doesn't
require on-disk format changes.  Same case as FIEMAP or
SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE to mention some recent features.

That being said this needs to follow them model of ext3/ext3/xfs and
add the inode to the unlink/orphan inode list on tmpfile creation and
move it out on flink.

We'll also need a proper verifier for the expected behaviour, which I
hope we'll get out of the work in progress XFS support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux