Re: Filesystem module autoprobe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 22:34 -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> I thought that these days module autoprobe was pretty much taken care
> of and that in the case of filesystems, an attempt to mount a
> filesystem for which a module had not yet been loaded would result in
> the kernel forking a modprobe on fs-xxx, which would use the module
> aliases to match up an appropriate module and load it.  So why is it
> that when I try to mount an ext2 filesystem mount complains that
> there's no such filesystem until I modprobe ext2?

If you're expecting

mount /dev/sda1 /mnt

to insert all the available filesystem modules and discover
that /dev/sda1 is ext2, this is a case of mismatched user expectations
(because we won't).

If

mount -t ext2 /dev/sda1 /mnt

isn't autoprobing, that's either a bug or a distribution problem.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux