Re: [PATCH 05/18] fs: make posix_acl_chmod more useful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:07:20PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Christoph,
> 
> > +int
> > +posix_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	struct posix_acl *acl;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || !inode->i_op->set_acl)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> Symlinks never have get_acl callbacks, so I would remove the S_ISLNK() check here.

Yeah, will simplify it.  Same for the other places where we have both
checks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux