Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 3/3] vfs: Fix a regression in mounting proc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



To all: sorry for noise, I can't comment this patch.


But Eric, could you please help me to understand? I am totally confused.

So, afaics, initially (even after MS_KERNMOUNT) fs_fully_visible("proc")
should return false.

After the normal "mout -t proc none /proc/" it becomes true.

And it is still true after, say, "mount -t ramfs none /proc/sys" because
"ls -ld /proc/sys" shows ->i_nlink == 1.

However, say, "mount -t ramfs none /proc/tty/" should make
fs_fully_visible() == F, because in this case ->i_nlink == 4.

Correct?

If yes, could you explain what this "!CAP_SYS_ADMIN && !fs_fully_visible"
check actually tries to prevent and why?

Thanks,

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux