On Wed 20-11-13 13:49:59, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:41:23 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 13 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 786 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.h > > > > Guys, what do you think? The patch definitely needs more testing but it > > survives some basic tests. Also it's rather large so I can try to split it > > a bit but since this is an infrastructure change it's hard to make it in > > small steps... > > It's certainly a large patch, but the description makes it sound good ;) > > What have you been using to test it? Do we actually have a decent > *notify test suite, or does everyone hack up their own, then let it > rot? Today, I've submitted a test coverage of fanotify syscalls to LTP :). inotify syscalls already have a coverage there so I tested them as well. I didn't really test dnotify or audit (besides compilation) but changes there were pretty minimal. Testing caught some minor issues so I'll be sending V2 today or tomorrow (I want to try to split the patch a bit). Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
