On 11/15/2013 07:50 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Privileged user should have rights to mount/umount/move >> these even locked mount. > > Hmm. This is pretty much a can't happen case, as the only exist in mount > namespaces where the global root isn't the root. How are you getting > into this situation? Using setns() ? > Before, priviged user can use setns to set his mount namespace to the container's mount namespace, and change container's mount directly. this patch just gives back host the control of container. > Why would we even care? > > As implemented this patch does not handle nested user namespaces and > that really worries me at a semantic level. > > We don't want to design cases where we can create containers in > containers. > > Eric > > >> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/namespace.c | 14 ++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c >> index da5c494..7097fc7 100644 >> --- a/fs/namespace.c >> +++ b/fs/namespace.c >> @@ -1297,6 +1297,11 @@ static inline bool may_mount(void) >> return ns_capable(current->nsproxy->mnt_ns->user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN); >> } >> >> +static inline bool may_mount_lock(struct mount *mnt) >> +{ >> + return !(mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Now umount can handle mount points as well as block devices. >> * This is important for filesystems which use unnamed block devices. >> @@ -1330,7 +1335,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(umount, char __user *, name, int, flags) >> goto dput_and_out; >> if (!check_mnt(mnt)) >> goto dput_and_out; >> - if (mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED) >> + if (!may_mount_lock(mnt)) >> goto dput_and_out; >> >> retval = do_umount(mnt, flags); >> @@ -1768,7 +1773,8 @@ static int do_loopback(struct path *path, const char *old_name, >> if (!check_mnt(parent) || !check_mnt(old)) >> goto out2; >> >> - if (!recurse && has_locked_children(old, old_path.dentry)) >> + if (!recurse && has_locked_children(old, old_path.dentry) && >> + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >> goto out2; >> >> if (recurse) >> @@ -1895,7 +1901,7 @@ static int do_move_mount(struct path *path, const char *old_name) >> if (!check_mnt(p) || !check_mnt(old)) >> goto out1; >> >> - if (old->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED) >> + if (!may_mount_lock(old)) >> goto out1; >> >> err = -EINVAL; >> @@ -2679,7 +2685,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pivot_root, const char __user *, new_root, >> goto out4; >> if (!check_mnt(root_mnt) || !check_mnt(new_mnt)) >> goto out4; >> - if (new_mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCKED) >> + if (!may_mount_lock(new_mnt)) >> goto out4; >> error = -ENOENT; >> if (d_unlinked(new.dentry)) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html