Re: Revert 9745cdb36da83aeec198650b410ca06304cf792 ("select: use freezable blocking call")?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/29/2013 10:15 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 21:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On 10/29/2013 8:41 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
4) Should this commit be reverted? Or is there a better fix?
In short, yes, it should.

I've already queued up a revert of something very similar and I'm going
to revert this one too.
If you do, the revert should go into stable for v3.11+ too, shouldn't
it?

I'll ask stable to pick it up later (or you can do that too).

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux