Re: [PATCH] ext4: pair trace_ext4_writepages & trace_ext4_writepages_result

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Ming Lei wrote:

> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:28:46 +0800
> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>     Ted Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>     "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: pair trace_ext4_writepages &
>     trace_ext4_writepages_result
> 
> Pair the two trace events to make troubeshooting writepages
> easier, and it should be more convinient to write a simple script
> to parse the traces.
> 
> Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It looks good.

Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c |   11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 32beaa4..0ad73d4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2420,16 +2420,15 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	 * because that could violate lock ordering on umount
>  	 */
>  	if (!mapping->nrpages || !mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY))
> -		return 0;
> +		goto out_writepages;
>  
>  	if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) {
>  		struct blk_plug plug;
> -		int ret;
>  
>  		blk_start_plug(&plug);
>  		ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __writepage, mapping);
>  		blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out_writepages;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2442,8 +2441,10 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	 * *never* be called, so if that ever happens, we would want
>  	 * the stack trace.
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(sbi->s_mount_flags & EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED))
> -		return -EROFS;
> +	if (unlikely(sbi->s_mount_flags & EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED)) {
> +		ret = -EROFS;
> +		goto out_writepages;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
>  		/*
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux