On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 05:29:10PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:07:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Ben, > > > > are you fine with the series now? It's been in linux-next for a while > > and it would be really helpful to get it in for the avarious places > > trying to do in-kernel file aio without going through the page cache. > > No, I am not okay with it. The feedback I provided 2 months ago has yet to > be addressed. Maybe I'm missing something, but the only big discussion item was that you'd want something totally unrelated (notification for blocking) mashed into this patch set. While I agree that getting that would be useful it is something that has nothing to do with issueing aio from kernel space and holding this patchset hostage for something you'd like to see but that was complicated enough that no one even tried it for many years seems entirely unreasonable. If there are any other issues left that I have missed it would be nice to get a pointer to it, or a quick brief. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
