On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:30AM -0700, Frank Filz wrote: > > I guess my main concern is that while I'm interested in adding interfaces > that > > make it _easier_ to implement fileservers, I'm not terribly interested in > > adding interfaces that are _specific_ to implementing them. > > > > Whatever interface we add needs to be generic enough to be useful to other > > applications as well. The changes you're suggesting sound rather specific > to a > > particular use-case. > > Sure, understood, though the Samba folks may have some input here also > (though at least they have a process per connection still right? So the Yes, correct. With the changes we have to make to support SMB3 Multichannel this might change in the near future tough. Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
