Re: [PATCH 17/17] RCU'd vfsmounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Anyway, I've done nicer variants of that protection for everything except
> fuse (hadn't gotten around to it yet); see vfs.git#experimental now:

Ok, I did a quick test, and it looks ok here, so looking good for 3.13.

However, the new smp_mb() in mntput_no_expire() is quite noticeable in
the path lookup stress-test profiles. And I'm not seeing what that
allegedly protects against, especially if mnt_ns is NULL (ie all the
common important cases).

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux