From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx> Move the d_move() in vfs_rename_dir() up, similarly to how it's done in vfs_rename_other(). The next patch will consolidate these two functions and this is the only structural difference between them. I'm not sure if doing the d_move() after the dput is even valid. But there may be a logical explanation for that. But moving the d_move() before the dput() (and the mutex_unlock()) should definitely not hurt. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx> --- fs/namei.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 645268f..911aadc 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -4007,13 +4007,12 @@ static int vfs_rename_dir(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, target->i_flags |= S_DEAD; dont_mount(new_dentry); } + if (!(old_dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE)) + d_move(old_dentry, new_dentry); out: if (target) mutex_unlock(&target->i_mutex); dput(new_dentry); - if (!error) - if (!(old_dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE)) - d_move(old_dentry,new_dentry); return error; } -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
