Re: [RFC] extending splice for copy offloading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/30/2013 04:00 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
pNFS, FhGFS, Lustre, Ceph, etc., all of them shall implement their own interface? And userspace needs to address all of them differently?

The NFS and SCSI groups have each defined a standard which Zach's proposal abstracts into a common user API.

Distributed file systems tend to be rather unique and do not have similar standard bodies, but a lot of them could hide server specific implementations under the current proposed interfaces.

What is not a good idea is to drag out the core, simple copy offload discussion for another 5 years to pull in every odd use case :)

ric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux