Hi Russ, That's what I wanted before. Merged. Thanks, 2013-09-24 (화), 15:53 -0500, Russ Knize: > This is an alternate solution to the deadlock problem I mentioned in > my previous patch. > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Russ Knize <rknize@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Russ Knize <Russ.Knize@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > f2fs_initxattrs() is called internally from within F2FS and should > > not call functions that are used by VFS handlers. This avoids > > certain deadlocks: > > > > - vfs_create() > > - f2fs_create() <-- takes an fs_lock > > - f2fs_add_link() > > - __f2fs_add_link() > > - init_inode_metadata() > > - f2fs_init_security() > > - security_inode_init_security() > > - f2fs_initxattrs() > > - f2fs_setxattr() <-- also takes an fs_lock > > > > If the caller happens to grab the same fs_lock from the pool in both > > places, they will deadlock. There are also deadlocks involving > > multiple threads and mutexes: > > > > - f2fs_write_begin() > > - f2fs_balance_fs() <-- takes gc_mutex > > - f2fs_gc() > > - write_checkpoint() > > - block_operations() > > - mutex_lock_all() <-- blocks trying to grab all fs_locks > > > > - f2fs_mkdir() <-- takes an fs_lock > > - __f2fs_add_link() > > - f2fs_init_security() > > - security_inode_init_security() > > - f2fs_initxattrs() > > - f2fs_setxattr() > > - f2fs_balance_fs() <-- blocks trying to take gc_mutex > > > > Signed-off-by: Russ Knize <Russ.Knize@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/f2fs/xattr.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c > > index 1ac8a5f..3d900ea 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c > > @@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ static int f2fs_xattr_advise_set(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, > > } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_SECURITY > > +static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int name_index, > > + const char *name, const void *value, size_t value_len, > > + struct page *ipage); > > static int f2fs_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > > void *page) > > { > > @@ -161,7 +164,7 @@ static int f2fs_initxattrs(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, > > int err = 0; > > > > for (xattr = xattr_array; xattr->name != NULL; xattr++) { > > - err = f2fs_setxattr(inode, F2FS_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > > + err = __f2fs_setxattr(inode, F2FS_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY, > > xattr->name, xattr->value, > > xattr->value_len, (struct page *)page); > > if (err < 0) > > @@ -469,16 +472,15 @@ cleanup: > > return error; > > } > > > > -int f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int name_index, const char *name, > > - const void *value, size_t value_len, struct page *ipage) > > +static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int name_index, > > + const char *name, const void *value, size_t value_len, > > + struct page *ipage) > > { > > - struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb); > > struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode); > > struct f2fs_xattr_entry *here, *last; > > void *base_addr; > > int found, newsize; > > size_t name_len; > > - int ilock; > > __u32 new_hsize; > > int error = -ENOMEM; > > > > @@ -493,10 +495,6 @@ int f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int name_index, const char *name, > > if (name_len > F2FS_NAME_LEN || value_len > MAX_VALUE_LEN(inode)) > > return -ERANGE; > > > > - f2fs_balance_fs(sbi); > > - > > - ilock = mutex_lock_op(sbi); > > - > > base_addr = read_all_xattrs(inode, ipage); > > if (!base_addr) > > goto exit; > > @@ -578,7 +576,24 @@ int f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int name_index, const char *name, > > else > > update_inode_page(inode); > > exit: > > - mutex_unlock_op(sbi, ilock); > > kzfree(base_addr); > > return error; > > } > > + > > +int f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int name_index, const char *name, > > + const void *value, size_t value_len, struct page *ipage) > > +{ > > + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb); > > + int ilock; > > + int err; > > + > > + f2fs_balance_fs(sbi); > > + > > + ilock = mutex_lock_op(sbi); > > + > > + err = __f2fs_setxattr(inode, name_index, name, value, value_len, ipage); > > + > > + mutex_unlock_op(sbi, ilock); > > + > > + return err; > > +} > > -- > > 1.7.10.4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Jaegeuk Kim Samsung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html