Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless update of refcount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/04/2013 11:14 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Waiman Long<waiman.long@xxxxxx>  wrote:
The latest tty patches did work. The tty related spinlock contention is now
completely gone. The short workload can now reach over 8M JPM which is the
highest I have ever seen.
Good. And this was with the 80-core machine, so there aren't any
scalability issues hiding?

              Linus

Yes, the perf profile was taking from an 80-core machine. There isn't any scalability issue hiding for the short workload on an 80-core machine.

However, I am certain that more may pop up when running in an even larger machine like the prototype 240-core machine that our team has been testing on.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux