Re: [PATCHv4 0/5] ceph: persistent caching with fscache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> David, are the fscache patches here ready for the next merge window?  Do 
> you have a preference for whose tree they go through?

There's only one problem - patch 1 needs to come _after_ patch 2 to avoid
breaking git bisect.  Plus these patches 2 and 4 extend the fscache API
without adjusting the documentation - but that can be added later.

And I think Milosz deserves a beer (or other poison of his choice;-) for
finding a longstanding irritating bug.

I think AFS, CIFS, NFS and 9P all need patching too, but I can attend to that.

Should I take the patches through my tree?  Then I can make the adjustments.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux