Am 03.09.2013 19:22, schrieb Mark Fasheh: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu: >>> Hello, >>> >>> It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 >>> several years ago: >>> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 >>> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 >>> >>> The old bug ticket for the discussion: >>> https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 >>> >>> This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that >>> the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this >>> sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline? >> >> Hmm, not fun. >> In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem. >> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). >> >> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline. > > Can you show me what branch you are talking about here? https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git seems to contain fixes for years which are not mainline. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
