On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:38:47 +0200 > Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> A Samsung series-5 ultrabook. >> >> $ grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq >> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2467M CPU @ 1.60GHz > > I believe the number of CPUs is more important. But as this is an > ultrabook, I doubt that is very high. > Fantastic Four. > Now I know this isn't going to be popular, but I'll suggest it anyway. > What about only implementing the lockref locking when CPUs are greater > than 7, 7 or less will still use the normal optimized spinlocks. > I have seen that spinlock-lockref stuff is more important on that monster-machines. It's good to see it does not break "smaller" systems. - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
