Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Tighten up linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sure.  But aren't they always last?

What do you mean? I'd say that the /proc lookup is always *innermost*.
Which means that it certainly cannot bail out, since there are many
levels of nesting outside of it.

> With the current code structure, trying to enforce some kind of
> security restriction in the middle of lookup seems really unpleasant.

If it's conditional (ie "linkat behaves differently from openat"), it
certainly means that we'd have to pass in that info in annoying ways.

But having unconditional rules like "you can only follow the proc link
if you have CAP_SEARCH _or_ you match the file->f_cred" doesn't sound
too painful.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux