Re: What does this sparse warning mean in posix_acl.h?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:14:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> So anybody using "get_cached_acl()" is safe. It gets either a locked
> ref-counted ACL pointer, or an unlocked optimistic NULL pointer.

Ah, I see.  But as we start adding the RCU annotations and the calls
to rcu_derference(), then I imagine we'll start triggering warnings
from various other static analysis tools, even if it makes sparse happy.

> So the ACL accesses are this somewhat strange mix of RCU and non-RCU
> use. We probably could make *more* of them use the RCU model, but
> apart from the RCU pathname lookup nothing else has ever been critical
> enough to care.

Ugh.  OK, I care mostly because it's adding noise to my make C=1 runs,
but I'm not sure I care enough to fix it up right away.  I'll put it
on my todo list, and hope someone beats me to it.  :-)

         	   	     	  	  - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux