> And FWIW, it's no secret that XFS has more per-operation overhead > than ext4 through the write path when it comes to allocation, so > it's no surprise that on a workload that is highly dependent on > allocation overhead that ext4 is a bit faster.... This cannot explain a worse scaling curve though? w-i-s is all about scaling. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
